更新时间: 试题数量: 购买人数: 提供作者:

有效期: 个月

章节介绍: 共有个章节

收藏
搜索
题库预览
Thank you for helping us understand the various components of a Hyper location deployment. This is clear to us now, Our next challenge is deploying locations services to both of our warehouse (the existing UKWH1 and the new MALWH1) However, we have few questions about the implementation of these services. What are the requirements for a CMX solutions ? How many instances of CMX will be required ? where should they be installed ? How do we license them ? Would you please address our implementation questions while keeping in mind our original requirements - HA is not a requirement for now - We prefer local services for UKWH1 so we can fully control CMX-WLC communication. This plan should give us fewer connectivity issues between the boxes and keep latency between them to a minimum. We are aiming for the highest location accuracy results and up-to date reliable data location tracking and analysis. - The previous point doesn't apply to MALWH1 where we would like to implement a simpler CMX deployment because we won't need such accurate location tracking there for at least the next two years. We are interested in thoroughly testing and learning everything we need to know from our UKWH1 deployment first. For now basic location insights and analysis will be enough for MALWH1. Please remember we will be deploying Hyper location and testing it only in a specific area (area 20 ) UKWH1. - It is important to note MALWH1 is running into power constraints until they are resolved. We are limited by the amount of new devices we can add to the network infrastructure there. Our IT team in Malaysia remains small. So we would like to limit the number of devices we have manage there, if possible. - AS usual we need to keep CAPEX to a minimum Refer to the new resource(s) available. Which two deployment options will make CMX services available in both warehouse locations while meeting all of the customer’s requirements? (Choose two.)
1 2