4级完形填空_在线真题试卷与模拟练习_4级完形填空_考试宝

更新时间：试题数量：购买人数：提供作者：

有效期：个月

章节介绍：共有个章节

收藏

我的练习

我的错题
(0道)

我的收藏
(0道)

我的斩题
(0道)

我的笔记
(0道)

专项练习

顺序练习 0 / 0

随机练习 自定义设置练习量

题型乱序 按导入顺序练习

模拟考试 仿真模拟

题型练习 按题型分类练习

易错题 精选高频易错题

学习资料 考试学习相关信息

搜索

题库预览

More than forty thousand readers told us what they looked for in close friendships, what they expected of friends, what they were willing to give in ( ) return, and how satisfied they were with the quality of their friendships. The results give little comfort to social critics.

More than forty thousand readers told us what they looked for in close friendships, what they expected of friends, what they were willing to give in return, and how satisfied they were with the quality of their friendships. The ( ) give little comfort to social critics.

Friendship appears to be a unique form of ( ) bonding. Unlike marriage or the ties that bind parents and children, it is not defined or regulated by law . Unlike other social roles that we are expected to play--as citizens, employees, members of professional societies and other organizations--it has its own principle, which is to promote feelings of warmth, trust, love, and affection between two people.

Friendship appears to be a unique form of human bonding. Unlike marriage or the ties that bind parents and children, it is not defined or regulated by ( ) . Unlike other social roles that we are expected to play--as citizens, employees, members of professional societies and other organizations--it has its own principle, which is to promote feelings of warmth, trust, love, and affection between two people.

Friendship appears to be a unique form of human bonding. Unlike marriage or the ties that bind parents and children, it is not defined or regulated by law . Unlike other social roles that we are expected to play--as citizens, employees, members of professional ( ) organizations--it has its own principle, which is to promote feelings of warmth, trust, love, and affection between two people.

Friendship appears to be a unique form of human bonding. Unlike marriage or the ties that bind parents and children, it is not defined or regulated by law . Unlike other social roles that we are expected to play--as citizens, employees, members of professional societies and other organizations--it has its own principle, which is to promote feelings of warmth, trust, love, and affection ( ) two people.

The survy on friendship appeared in the March issue of Psychology. Today, the findings ( ) that issues of trust and betrayal are main to friendship. They also suggest that our readers do not look for friends only among those who are more like them, but find many who differ in race, religion, and ethnic background. Arguably the most important conclusion that emerges from the data, however, is not something that we found-but what we did not.

The survy on friendship appeared in the March issue of Psychology. Today, the findings confirm that issues of trust and betrayal are main to friendship. They also suggest that our readers do not ( ) for friends only among those who are more like them, but find many who differ in race, religion, and ethnic background. Arguably the most important conclusion that emerges from the data, however, is not something that we found-but what we did not.

The survy on friendship appeared in the March issue of Psychology. Today, the findings confirm that issues of trust and betrayal are main to friendship. They also suggest that our readers do not look for friends only among those who are more like them, but find many ( ) differ in race, religion, and ethnic background. Arguably the most important conclusion that emerges from the data, however, is not something that we found-but what we did not.

The survy on friendship appeared in the March issue of Psychology. Today, the findings confirm that issues of trust and betrayal are main to friendship. They also suggest that our readers do not look for friends only among those who are more like them, but find many who differ in race, religion, and ethnic background. Arguably the most important conclusion that emerges from the data, ( ) , is not something that we found-but what we did not.

罗曼语是拉丁语的现代后裔，拉丁语是罗马帝国的语言。在现代罗曼语中，意大利语、法语、西班牙语、葡萄牙语和罗马尼亚语都是整个民族的语言，而加泰罗尼亚语、普罗旺斯语、雷托 - 罗马语、撒丁语和摩尔多瓦语则局限于个别国家的较小地区。随着罗马的军队将帝国的疆界扩展到欧洲大陆的大部分地区，拉丁语作为新的行政语言被引入各地。口语拉丁语在开始的时候是相当统一的，尽管它已经与古典文学中的拉丁语有了明显的不同。但是，随着罗马帝国开始崩溃，罗马行政官员开始消失，每个地区的拉丁语开始以自己独特的方式发展。由于彼此相距遥远，自然受到周围民族语言的影响，每一种语言都发展出自己独特的特点，以致成为一种独立的语言。因为我们在这里讨论的是一个缓慢而难以察觉的过程，所以很难说口语拉丁语何时结束，浪漫主义何时开始。但到公元5世纪，这种分歧肯定已经开始了，到公元8世纪，我们可以在各种罗马方言的基本词汇和语法上发现明显的差异。罗曼语中最古老的文本是《斯特拉斯堡宣誓》，这是一份公元842年用古法语写成的文件。罗曼语的演变持续到现代10次，每一次都不断受到新的地理和民族因素的影响。每种语言都大量借用了各种非罗曼语系的语言。【缺少答案，请补充】